Congress has fixed this before. In 1983 it was months away from the same crisis and fixed it. It has not acted yet this time.
Here is everything you need to understand about what is happening and what can stop it.
HOW SOCIAL SECURITY IS FUNDED
Social Security is funded primarily by payroll taxes. If you have ever looked at your pay stub and seen FICA or Social Security tax deducted that is the money that funds the program.
The current payroll tax rate is 12.4 percent of wages up to $184,500 in 2026. Employees pay 6.2 percent. Employers pay the other 6.2 percent. Self-employed people pay the full 12.4 percent themselves. Income above $184,500 is not subject to the Social Security payroll tax at all — that cap is important and we will come back to it.
That money goes into the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund — called the OASI trust fund. Every month the Social Security Administration pays out benefits from that fund to approximately 68 million Americans including retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and dependents.
For most of Social Security's history the program collected more in payroll taxes than it paid out in benefits. The surplus went into the trust fund and earned interest. The trust fund built up a large reserve over decades.
That changed in 2021. For the first time Social Security began paying out more in benefits than it collected in payroll taxes. The program is now drawing down its reserve to make up the difference. When the reserve runs out — projected for late 2032 — the only money available to pay benefits will be whatever comes in from payroll taxes that month. And that will only be enough to cover approximately 78 percent of what recipients are owed.
WHY THE TRUST FUND IS RUNNING OUT
Three confirmed factors are driving the depletion.
The population is aging. The baby boom generation — 76 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964 — is now retiring in large numbers. There are fewer workers paying into the system relative to the number of retirees collecting benefits. In 1960 there were more than 5 workers paying in for every 1 retiree collecting. Today that ratio is 2.9 to 1. By the 2070s it is projected to fall to 2.2 to 1. Fewer workers supporting more retirees is the fundamental math problem.
The taxable wage cap has not kept up. In 1983 the payroll tax applied to 90 percent of all wages earned in America. Today it applies to only 83 percent because high-income wages have grown much faster than the cap. The Bipartisan Policy Center confirmed that the shrinking share of wages subject to the payroll tax is a significant contributor to the funding gap.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made it worse. The 2026 Social Security Trustees Report confirmed that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by President Trump on July 4, 2025 accelerated the depletion date by moving it from early 2033 to late 2032. The law's expanded tax provisions for seniors reduced the amount of income tax on Social Security benefits that flows back into the trust fund. The Social Security Administration's chief actuary confirmed in writing that the law would have material effects on the financial status of the trust funds.
THE CONFIRMED NUMBERS — WHAT A CUT MEANS IN REAL LIFE
The 2026 Trustees Report confirmed that if the trust fund is depleted with no congressional action, benefits will be cut by approximately 22 percent. The CBO's February 2026 projection put the cut at 28 percent. The difference reflects different economic assumptions. Both are confirmed projections from nonpartisan government agencies.
The average Social Security retirement benefit as of April 2026 was $2,081 per month, confirmed by the SSA's Monthly Statistical Snapshot.
A 22 percent cut means $458 less per month. That is $5,496 less per year.
A 28 percent cut means $583 less per month. That is $6,996 less per year.
The cut would apply to every recipient equally. A retired teacher in Kansas gets the same percentage cut as a retired Wall Street executive. There is no means testing built into the automatic cut mechanism. Everyone loses the same share.
For the approximately 40 percent of retirees who depend on Social Security for 90 percent or more of their income — confirmed by SSA research — a cut of this size is not an inconvenience. It is a financial crisis.
For Gen X workers currently between 46 and 61 years old the stakes are different but equally significant. Kiplinger confirmed that Gen X workers need to save approximately $701 per month more than they are currently saving to compensate for a potential 28 percent benefit cut. That is money most Gen X households do not have available.
THE 1983 PRECEDENT — IT HAS BEEN FIXED BEFORE
The most important fact about the current Social Security crisis is that America has been here before. And fixed it.
In 1983 the Social Security trust fund was months away from running out of money. Recipients were weeks from seeing their checks cut. Congress and President Reagan's administration negotiated a bipartisan fix under the leadership of a commission chaired by economist Alan Greenspan.
The 1983 Social Security Amendments did several things simultaneously. They raised the payroll tax rate. They gradually increased the full retirement age from 65 to 67 over several decades. They began taxing Social Security benefits as income for higher-income recipients for the first time. They accelerated the schedule for cost-of-living adjustments.
The 1983 fix kept Social Security solvent for more than 40 years. The program was not supposed to face another funding crisis until now.
The confirmed lesson from 1983 is that the problem is solvable. It requires Congress to act before the deadline, not after. And it requires both parties to agree on a combination of changes that together close the funding gap.
WHAT COULD FIX IT — THE CONFIRMED OPTIONS
Every serious proposal to fix Social Security involves some combination of the following options. Every option has tradeoffs. None of them is painless.
OPTION 1 — Raise or eliminate the payroll tax cap.
Currently income above $184,500 is not subject to the Social Security payroll tax. Lifting or eliminating that cap would require higher earners to pay Social Security tax on more of their income. The Social Security Administration has confirmed this would significantly extend the trust fund's solvency. Critics argue it amounts to a large tax increase on higher earners.
OPTION 2 — Raise the payroll tax rate.
Increasing the rate from 12.4 percent to 14.4 or 15.4 percent would generate more revenue. Workers and employers would each pay a higher percentage. Critics argue this reduces take-home pay for working Americans.
OPTION 3 — Raise the full retirement age.
The current full retirement age is 67 for people born after 1960. Raising it to 68 or 69 would reduce the number of years people collect benefits and save money. Critics argue this effectively cuts benefits for people who cannot work into their late 60s due to physical demands of their jobs or health conditions. Blue-collar workers and people of color have lower life expectancies on average and would be disproportionately affected.
OPTION 4 — Reduce cost-of-living adjustments.
Social Security benefits are adjusted annually for inflation. Using a different inflation measure that produces smaller annual increases would save money over time. Critics argue this would erode the purchasing power of benefits for current retirees.
OPTION 5 — Reduce benefits for higher earners.
Means-testing or reducing benefits for retirees with higher incomes would preserve more money for lower-income recipients. Critics argue this changes the fundamental nature of Social Security as a universal program that everyone pays into and benefits from.
OPTION 6 — Increase immigration.
More working-age immigrants paying into the system improves the ratio of workers to retirees and generates more payroll tax revenue. The Bipartisan Policy Center confirmed that declining immigration projections contributed to the worsening 2026 outlook. Critics have political objections to immigration-based solutions regardless of their fiscal impact.
Most serious proposals combine several of these options rather than relying on any single one. The 1983 fix used a combination approach. The Bipartisan Policy Center and other nonpartisan organizations have confirmed that a combination approach distributes the burden more broadly and is more politically achievable than any single large change.
WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW
Call your state representative in congress. If you don’t know who that is or have their contact information you can go to Congress.gov and search by your address. It may seem like it doesn’t matter but it really does make a difference when they know you are paying attention. Tell them it’s important they take action now if they want your support this November election. Ask for an update and pay attention to whether or not they act.
Log into your Social Security account at ssa.gov. Look at your projected benefit estimate. Do the math at a 22 to 28 percent reduction. That is your planning number if Congress does not act.
If you are between 62 and 70 the decision of when to claim Social Security is among the most financially significant decisions you will make. Every year you delay past 62 increases your benefit by up to 8 percent. If you can afford to delay claiming — using other savings or income as a bridge — delaying reduces your exposure to the percentage cut because your base benefit is higher.
Maximize your 401k catch-up contributions. Workers over 50 can contribute up to $31,000 to a 401k in 2026. Workers between 60 and 63 can contribute up to $35,750 under the SECURE 2.0 super catch-up provision. Every dollar you save now is a dollar that does not depend on Congress acting in time.
Reduce debt before retirement. The best protection against a benefit cut is a lower cost of living. A household with no mortgage and no car payment can absorb a Social Security cut far better than one carrying significant debt.
Contact your members of Congress. The phone numbers for every member of Congress are available at congress.gov. Social Security solvency is not a partisan issue — it affects every American who has paid into the system regardless of party. Constituent calls on this issue are tracked and matter.
Sources: SSA 2026 Trustees Report released June 2026 confirmed late 2032 depletion date, 78 percent benefits covered, and OBBBA material effects · CBO February 2026 confirmed 2032 depletion and 28 percent cut · Bipartisan Policy Center June 2026 confirmed 22 percent cut, taxable wage cap at 83 percent, and immigration projection impact · SSA Monthly Statistical Snapshot April 2026 confirmed $2,081 average monthly benefit · Fox Business June 2026 confirmed 2026 Trustees Report details and Speaker Johnson statement · CNBC June 2026 confirmed 1983 precedent and combination approach · Kiplinger confirmed $701 per month Gen X savings gap · SSA confirmed 40 percent of retirees dependent on Social Security for 90 percent of income · IRS 2026 confirmed $31,000 catch-up contribution limit · SECURE 2.0 Act confirmed $35,750 super catch-up for ages 60 to 63 · Congress.gov confirmed 1983 Social Security Amendments details
Now you know. Read Ida's daily nonpartisan news briefing at readida.com